| Title |
Transplantation of nano-bioglass/gelatin scaffold in a non-autogenous setting for bone regeneration in a rabbit ulna
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10856-012-4722-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Forough Hafezi, Fatemeh Hosseinnejad, Abbas Ali Imani Fooladi, Soroush Mohit Mafi, Afsaneh Amiri, Mohammad Reza Nourani |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 60 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 27% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 13 | 21% |
| Engineering | 9 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,759,510
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#107
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,121
of 165,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.