Title |
Genomic characterization of two Chinese isolates of Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Virology, March 2004
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00705-004-0292-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Z. Q. Gao, X. Guo, H. C. Yang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 17 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 32% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
Professor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 32% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#930
of 4,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,783
of 68,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.