↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Verification Bias on the Sensitivity of Fecal Occult Blood Testing: a Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Verification Bias on the Sensitivity of Fecal Occult Blood Testing: a Meta-Analysis
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11606-010-1375-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan S. Rosman, Mark A. Korsten

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 66%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,943,894
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,251
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,389
of 98,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#30
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.