↓ Skip to main content

Moderate oxygen depletion as a factor favouring the filamentous growth of Sphaerotilus natans

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Moderate oxygen depletion as a factor favouring the filamentous growth of Sphaerotilus natans
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10482-015-0405-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Seder-Colomina, Anne Goubet, Sébastien Lacroix, Guillaume Morin, Georges Ona-Nguema, Giovanni Esposito, Eric D. Van Hullebusch, Jean-Jacques Pernelle

Abstract

Sphaerotilus natans is a neutrophilic iron-related sheath-forming filamentous microorganism that presents dual morphotype: single cells and ensheathed cells forming filaments. As S. natans has been proposed as a sorbent for inorganic pollutants and it is occasionally involved in bulking episodes, elucidating factors affecting its filamentous growth is of crucial interest. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the effect of dissolved oxygen (DO) as a factor affecting S. natans filamentation from single cells. A method to quantify S. natans in its filamentous and single-cell morphotypes, based on a differential filtration procedure coupled with quantitative real-time PCR, was developed here. Scanning Electron Microscopy was used to validate the filtration step. Under actively aerated conditions (DO maintained at 7.6 ± 0.1 mg l(-1)), S. natans grew mainly as single cells throughout the experiment, while a depletion in DO concentration (to ~3 mg l(-1)) induced its filamentous growth. Indeed, when oxygen was reduced the proportion of single cells diminished from 83.3 ± 5.9  to 14.3 ± 3.4 % while the filaments increased from 16.7 ± 5.9  to 85.7 ± 3.4 %. Our results suggest that oxygen plays a key role in S. natans filamentation and contribute to better understanding of the filamentous proliferation of this bacterium. In addition, the proposed method will be helpful to evaluate other factors favouring filamentous growth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 29%
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 18%
Engineering 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,398,261
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#1,615
of 2,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,583
of 357,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#33
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,024 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.