| Title |
Angiogenesis in cancer: molecular mechanisms, clinical impact
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00423-007-0150-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. E. Eichhorn, A. Kleespies, M. K. Angele, K.-W. Jauch, C. J. Bruns |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,759,510
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#126
of 1,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,934
of 78,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.