↓ Skip to main content

Mutations in the FTSJ1 Gene Coding for a Novel S-Adenosylmethionine–Binding Protein Cause Nonsyndromic X-Linked Mental Retardation

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutations in the FTSJ1 Gene Coding for a Novel S-Adenosylmethionine–Binding Protein Cause Nonsyndromic X-Linked Mental Retardation
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, May 2004
DOI 10.1086/422507
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristine Freude, Kirsten Hoffmann, Lars-Riff Jensen, Martin B. Delatycki, Vincent des Portes, Bettina Moser, Ben Hamel, Hans van Bokhoven, Claude Moraine, Jean-Pierre Fryns, Jamel Chelly, Jozef Gécz, Steffen Lenzner, Vera M. Kalscheuer, Hans-Hilger Ropers

Abstract

Nonsyndromic X-linked mental retardation (NSXLMR) is a very heterogeneous condition, and most of the underlying gene defects are still unknown. Recently, we have shown that approximately 30% of these genes cluster on the proximal Xp, which prompted us to perform systematic mutation screening in brain-expressed genes from this region. Here, we report on a novel NSXLMR gene, FTSJ1, which harbors mutations in three unrelated families--one with a splicing defect, one with a nonsense mutation, and one with a deletion of one nucleotide. In two families, subsequent expression studies showed complete absence or significant reduction of mutant FTSJ1 transcripts. FTSJ1 protein is a homolog of Escherichia coli RNA methyltransferase FtsJ/RrmJ and may play a role in the regulation of translation. Further studies aim to elucidate the function of human FTSJ1 and its role during brain development.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 28%
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Professor 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 31%
Neuroscience 6 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 8 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2008.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#3,538
of 5,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,941
of 62,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#30
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.