↓ Skip to main content

PEG-stabilized carbodiimide crosslinked collagen–chitosan hydrogels for corneal tissue engineering

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Materials, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
357 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
375 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PEG-stabilized carbodiimide crosslinked collagen–chitosan hydrogels for corneal tissue engineering
Published in
Clinical Materials, July 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehrdad Rafat, Fengfu Li, Per Fagerholm, Neil S. Lagali, Mitchell A. Watsky, Rejean Munger, Takeshi Matsuura, May Griffith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 362 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 24%
Student > Master 56 15%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Bachelor 39 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 76 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 68 18%
Materials Science 52 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 11%
Chemistry 37 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 9%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 87 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Materials
#1,252
of 10,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,110
of 100,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Materials
#6
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.