You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Analysis of Nonlinear Spring Arm for Improved Performance of Vibrational Energy Harvesting Devices
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1088/1742-6596/476/1/012088 |
Authors |
D Mallick, A Amann, S Roy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 36% |
Student > Master | 3 | 21% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 10 | 71% |
Materials Science | 1 | 7% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physics: Conference Series
#1,124
of 7,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,927
of 320,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physics: Conference Series
#4
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.