↓ Skip to main content

Enhanced-throughput production of polymersomes using a parallelized capillary microfluidic device

Overview of attention for article published in Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Enhanced-throughput production of polymersomes using a parallelized capillary microfluidic device
Published in
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10404-012-1069-5
Authors

Shin-Hyun Kim, Jin Woong Kim, Do-Hoon Kim, Sang-Hoon Han, David A. Weitz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
China 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 97 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 32%
Student > Master 17 17%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Professor 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 35 35%
Chemistry 17 17%
Physics and Astronomy 9 9%
Chemical Engineering 8 8%
Materials Science 7 7%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 13 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,550,598
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from Microfluidics and Nanofluidics
#129
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,445
of 174,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microfluidics and Nanofluidics
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.