You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CAD/CAM ear model and virtual construction of the mold
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, November 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0022-3913(07)60116-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leonardo Ciocca, Roberto Mingucci, Gianfranco Gassino, Roberto Scotti |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 46% |
| Engineering | 27 | 23% |
| Design | 5 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#5,610,712
of 25,947,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
#175
of 2,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,702
of 90,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,947,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,767 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them