↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the Impact of Parental Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation on Evidence-Based Parenting Interventions: A Transdiagnostic Approach to Improving Treatment Effectiveness

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
Title
Exploring the Impact of Parental Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation on Evidence-Based Parenting Interventions: A Transdiagnostic Approach to Improving Treatment Effectiveness
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10567-013-0132-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashley C. Maliken, Lynn Fainsilber Katz

Abstract

Parenting interventions, particularly those categorized as parent management training (PMT), have a large evidence base supporting their effectiveness with most families who present for treatment of childhood behavior problems. However, data suggest that PMTs are not effective at treating all families who seek services. Parental psychopathology has been identified as one important factor moderating their effectiveness, yet few PMTs pay explicit attention to the role of parental psychopathology in treatment. Given growing support for a transdiagnostic model of psychopathology, which posits that disruptions in emotions and emotion regulation (ER) may underlie various forms of psychopathology, one way to address the impact of parental psychopathology on PMT may be by targeting parental ER. This paper will review the available literature on PMT and parental psychopathology, as well as existing evidence on relations between ER and both parental psychopathology and parenting behaviors. The limited research on PMTs that include explicitly parent-focused components will be reviewed, and suggestions for augmenting existing PMT curricula by including intervention around parental ER will be presented.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 275 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 21%
Student > Master 39 14%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 9%
Other 49 18%
Unknown 54 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 160 57%
Social Sciences 27 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 65 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#247
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,094
of 199,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.