| Title |
Optimal Algorithm for Shape from Shading and Path Planning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, May 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1011234012449 |
| Authors |
Ron Kimmel, James A. Sethian |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 30% |
| Researcher | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 38 | 40% |
| Computer Science | 31 | 32% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
#69
of 341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,304
of 42,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 341 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.