You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Can segmented 3D images be used for stenosis evaluation in coronary CT angiography?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Radiologica, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1258/ar.2012.120053 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chunliang Wang, Anders Persson, Jan Engvall, Jakob De Geer, Waldemar Czekierda, Anders Björkholm, Sven-Göran Fransson, Örjan Smedby |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 3 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
Researcher | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 50% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 10% |
Computer Science | 1 | 10% |
Engineering | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,316,150
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from Acta Radiologica
#33
of 1,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,931
of 172,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Radiologica
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,000 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.