| Title |
Physico-mechanical and Stability Evaluation of Carbamazepine Cocrystal with Nicotinamide
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AAPS PharmSciTech, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1208/s12249-011-9603-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ziyaur Rahman, Cyrus Agarabi, Ahmed S. Zidan, Saeed R. Khan, Mansoor A. Khan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 42 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 32 | 24% |
| Chemistry | 23 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 9 | 7% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 46 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,316,150
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#101
of 1,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,116
of 112,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,471 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.