↓ Skip to main content

Tensin is potentially involved in extracellular matrix production in mesangial cells

Overview of attention for article published in Histochemistry and Cell Biology, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Tensin is potentially involved in extracellular matrix production in mesangial cells
Published in
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, February 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00418-004-0626-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michifumi Yamashita, Satoshi Horikoshi, Katsuhiko Asanuma, Hisatsugu Takahara, Isao Shirato, Yasuhiko Tomino

Abstract

Tensin, a focal adhesion protein, is expressed in renal tubular epithelial cells (TECs). Tensin-null mice develop multiple large cysts in the renal proximal tubules. However, the role of tensin in human glomeruli remains unclear. In this study, we assessed tensin localization in human kidney and interaction between tensin and other adhesion components. In human mesangial cells (MCs) and TECs, we confirmed mRNA and protein expressions of tensin by RT-PCR and immunoprecipitation. In normal kidney, immunohistochemistry revealed that tensin was localized in MCs and parietal epithelial cells as well as TECs. In biopsy specimens, the expression of tensin was significantly increased in areas of mesangial expansion in patients with IgA nephropathy and diabetic nephropathy. These results suggest that the expression of tensin is associated with extracellular matrix (ECM) production. In vitro, immunocytochemistry revealed that MCs express tensin mainly at the ends of actin stress fibers and apparently in the focal adhesion areas. Integrin alpha5, but not alpha1 and alpha3, colocalized with tensin. Vinculin and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) were coprecipitated by tensin, suggesting that tensin can mediate signal transduction between cell and ECM through these molecules. Tensin may play important roles in mesangial ECM production through an adhesion complex with integrin alpha5, FAK, and vinculin.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Researcher 3 17%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Physics and Astronomy 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#306
of 1,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,365
of 62,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.