You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Associations of Low- and High-Intensity Light Activity with Cardiometabolic Biomarkers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1249/mss.0000000000000631 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
BETHANY HOWARD, ELISABETH A. H. WINKLER, PARNEET SETHI, VALERIE CARSON, NICOLA D. RIDGERS, JO SALMON, GENEVIEVE N. HEALY, NEVILLE OWEN, DAVID W. DUNSTAN |
| Abstract |
Light-intensity physical activity (LIPA) accounts for much of adults' waking hours (≈40%) and substantially contributes to overall daily energy expenditure. Encompassing activity behaviours of low intensity (standing with little movement) through to those with a higher intensity (slow walking), LIPA is ubiquitous, yet little is known about how associations with health may vary depending on its intensity. We examined the associations of objectively assessed LIPA, categorized as either low- or high- LIPA, and MVPA, with cardiometabolic risk biomarkers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 33% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 20% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 24% |
| Sports and Recreations | 20 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2015.
All research outputs
#2,635,163
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#2,098
of 7,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,186
of 286,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#44
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.