| Title |
Molecular cloning and characterisation of banana fruit polyphenol oxidase
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Planta, September 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004250100553 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul S. Gooding, Colin Bird, Simon P. Robinson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,836,056
of 23,746,606 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#90
of 2,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,120
of 39,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,746,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,791 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.