| Title |
Alzheimer disease models and human neuropathology: similarities and differences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, November 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00401-007-0312-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles Duyckaerts, Marie-Claude Potier, Benoît Delatour |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 546 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| Germany | 6 | 1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 1% |
| Unknown | 511 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 113 | 21% |
| Researcher | 102 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 74 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 103 | 19% |
| Unknown | 75 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 163 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 95 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 45 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 62 | 11% |
| Unknown | 90 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#751,626
of 24,293,076 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#102
of 2,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,035
of 66,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,293,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.