↓ Skip to main content

Investigations on carotenoids in fungi IV. Members of the Boletus genus

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, March 1978
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Investigations on carotenoids in fungi IV. Members of the Boletus genus
Published in
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, March 1978
DOI 10.1007/bf01092999
Authors

B. Czeczuga

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Professor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 43%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 14%
Chemical Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#288
of 744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,287
of 5,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them