↓ Skip to main content

Use of the tumor-infiltrating CD8 to FOXP3 lymphocyte ratio in predicting treatment responses to combination therapy with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for advanced HER2-positive breast…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Use of the tumor-infiltrating CD8 to FOXP3 lymphocyte ratio in predicting treatment responses to combination therapy with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for advanced HER2-positive breast cancer
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12967-018-1460-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koji Takada, Shinichiro Kashiwagi, Wataru Goto, Yuka Asano, Katsuyuki Takahashi, Tsutomu Takashima, Shuhei Tomita, Masahiko Ohsawa, Kosei Hirakawa, Masaichi Ohira

Abstract

The trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and docetaxel (TPD) regimen is strongly recommended as a treatment option for first-line therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2-positive breast cancer. Monitoring the host microenvironments in cancer plays a significant role in predicting prognoses and curative effects. It is important to clarify the role of immune related gene expression in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment. In this study, we evaluated the impact of chemotherapy with a TPD regimen, on immune micro environments in HER2-positive breast cancer using immune related proteins as indicators. The subjects consisted of 30 patients who received the TPD regimen. The expression levels of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki67, CD8, forkhead box protein (FOXP) 3, programmed death (PD) 1, programmed death ligand (PD-L) 1, CD163, phosphatase and tensin homolog and lymphocyte activation gene 3 were evaluated in biopsy specimens, by immunostaining. CD8+, CD8/FOXP3 ratio (CFR)highand PD-L1-group had significantly longer PFS than the CD8-, CFRlowand PDL1+group (p = 0.045, log-rank) (p = 0.007, log-rank) (p = 0.040, log-rank), respectively. The CFRhighgroup had significantly better OS than the CFRlowgroup (p = 0.034, log-rank). In the univariate analysis, CD8+, CFRhighgroups extended PFS significantly (p = 0.027, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.162) (p = 0.008, HR = 0.195), respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed that the results for CFR [area under the curve (AUC): 0.708] were better than those for other factors (AUC: CD8 = 0.681, FOXP3 = 0.639, PD1 = 0.528, PD-L1 = 0.681). This study shows with the TPD regimen, a high CFR leads to a high ORR and long PFS in HER2-positive breast cancer. CFR, therefore, may be one of the important prognostic factors for this disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 23 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 28%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 25 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,500,348
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,261
of 4,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,912
of 329,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#45
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.