| Title |
Comparative kinetic analysis of two fungal β-glucosidases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1754-6834-3-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie Chauve, Hugues Mathis, Delphine Huc, Dominique Casanave, Frédéric Monot, Nicolas Lopes Ferreira |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 26% |
| Researcher | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 20% |
| Unknown | 23 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 91 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 17% |
| Engineering | 22 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 17 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,798,611
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#207
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,525
of 174,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them