| Title |
IL-34 and CSF-1: similarities and differences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00774-013-0476-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuko Nakamichi, Nobuyuki Udagawa, Naoyuki Takahashi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 25% |
| Researcher | 24 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,729,080
of 25,090,809 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
#40
of 810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,668
of 203,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,090,809 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 810 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.