| Title |
Disulfide Scrambling in IgG2 Monoclonal Antibodies: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11095-011-0503-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaoling Wang, Sandeep Kumar, Satish K. Singh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,311,540
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#230
of 2,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,459
of 114,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#6
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.