↓ Skip to main content

Frequency-Domain Blind Source Separation of Many Speech Signals Using Near-Field and Far-Field Models

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Frequency-Domain Blind Source Separation of Many Speech Signals Using Near-Field and Far-Field Models
Published in
ADS, December 2006
DOI 10.1155/asp/2006/83683
Authors

Ryo Mukai, Hiroshi Sawada, Shoko Araki, Shoji Makino

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 40%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 47%
Computer Science 5 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#7,327
of 25,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,594
of 168,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#110
of 341 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 341 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.