↓ Skip to main content

Focus on phosphohistidine

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Focus on phosphohistidine
Published in
Amino Acids, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00726-006-0443-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. V. Attwood, M. J. Piggott, X. L. Zu, P. G. Besant

Abstract

Phosphohistidine has been identified as an enzymic intermediate in numerous biochemical reactions and plays a functional role in many regulatory pathways. Unlike the phosphoester bond of its cousins (phosphoserine, phosphothreonine and phosphotyrosine), the phosphoramidate (P-N) bond of phosphohistidine has a high DeltaG degrees of hydrolysis and is unstable under acidic conditions. This acid-lability has meant that the study of protein histidine phosphorylation and the associated protein kinases has been slower to progress than other protein phosphorylation studies. Histidine phosphorylation is a crucial component of cell signalling in prokaryotes and lower eukaryotes. It is also now becoming widely reported in mammalian signalling pathways and implicated in certain human disease states. This review covers the chemistry of phosphohistidine in terms of its isomeric forms and chemical derivatives, how they can be synthesized, purified, identified and the relative stabilities of each of these forms. Furthermore, we highlight how this chemistry relates to the role of phosphohistidine in its various biological functions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 134 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 26%
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 51 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 21 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,696,560
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#288
of 1,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,389
of 68,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.