| Title |
T cell avidity and tumor recognition: implications and therapeutic strategies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-3-35 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark D McKee, Jeffrey J Roszkowski, Michael I Nishimura |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 34% |
| Researcher | 8 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 38% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,406,966
of 23,509,253 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#581
of 4,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,421
of 59,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them