| Title |
Biological production of alcohols from coal through indirect liquefaction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, August 1988
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02930840 |
| Authors |
S. Barik, S. Prieto, S. B. Harrison, E. C. Clausen, J. L. Gaddy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 28% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 11 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
| Energy | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,316,150
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#81
of 2,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#703
of 13,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,532 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them