Title |
LAMP-based method for a rapid identification of Legionella spp. and Legionella pneumophila
|
---|---|
Published in |
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00253-011-3496-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xi Lu, Zi-Yao Mo, Hong-Bo Zhao, He Yan, Lei Shi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,089,278
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1,221
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,676
of 126,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#12
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.