You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differences in grass pollen allergen exposure across Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1753-6405.12325 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul J. Beggs, Constance H. Katelaris, Danielle Medek, Fay H. Johnston, Pamela K. Burton, Bradley Campbell, Alison K. Jaggard, Don Vicendese, David M.J.S. Bowman, Ian Godwin, Alfredo R. Huete, Bircan Erbas, Brett J. Green, Rewi M. Newnham, Ed Newbigin, Simon G. Haberle, Janet M. Davies |
| Abstract |
Allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma are important chronic diseases posing serious public health issues in Australia with associated medical, economic, and societal burdens. Pollen are significant sources of clinically relevant outdoor aeroallergens, recognised as both a major trigger for, and cause of, allergic respiratory diseases. This study aimed to provide a national, and indeed international, perspective on the state of Australian pollen data using a large representative sample. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 40% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 20% |
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 15 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,106,739
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#211
of 1,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,874
of 360,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#6
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.