| Title |
Synthesis and processing of hydroxyapatite ceramic tapes with controlled porosity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, May 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00121241 |
| Authors |
I. H. Arita, V. M. Castano, D. S. Wilkinson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 18 | 38% |
| Engineering | 7 | 15% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,760,027
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#107
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,217
of 25,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.