| Title |
Biological Activities of Extracts from Sumac (Rhus spp.): A Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11130-007-0058-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sierra Rayne, G. Mazza |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Algeria | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 47 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 25% |
| Chemistry | 17 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 53 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,841,315
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#190
of 715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,891
of 72,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them