You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
shRNA libraries and their use in cancer genetics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Methods, August 2006
|
DOI | 10.1038/nmeth921 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
René Bernards, Thijn R Brummelkamp, Roderick L Beijersbergen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 3% |
Germany | 6 | 2% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Mexico | 2 | <1% |
India | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 1% |
Unknown | 251 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 76 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 25% |
Student > Master | 25 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 22 | 8% |
Professor | 21 | 8% |
Other | 46 | 16% |
Unknown | 19 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 136 | 49% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 46 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
Other | 21 | 8% |
Unknown | 26 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2019.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#3,497
of 5,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,825
of 95,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#21
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.