| Title |
Sulfated polysaccharides from marine green algae Ulva conglobata and their anticoagulant activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10811-005-9008-4 |
| Authors |
Wenjun Mao, Xiaoxue Zang, Yi Li, Huijuan Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 42 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 8% |
| Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,851,051
of 23,377,816 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#222
of 2,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,419
of 67,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,377,816 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,573 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them