| Title |
Multiple-copy integration in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Genetics, July 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00326302 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie-Thérèse Le Dall, Jean-Marc Nicaud, Claude Gaillardin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 25% |
| Researcher | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 22% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,474,261
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Current Genetics
#13
of 1,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#743
of 21,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Genetics
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them