| Title |
Differentiated Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Sciatic Nerve Injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12015-010-9227-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michal Dadon-Nachum, Ofer Sadan, Itay Srugo, Eldad Melamed, Daniel Offen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 22% |
| Researcher | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#219
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,623
of 118,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.