↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Care Specialty on Survival-Adjusted Medical Costs of COPD Patients After a Hospitalization: a longitudinal analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
The Impact of Care Specialty on Survival-Adjusted Medical Costs of COPD Patients After a Hospitalization: a longitudinal analysis
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11606-018-4406-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenjia Chen, Don D. Sin, J. Mark FitzGerald, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, for the Canadian Respiratory Research Network

Abstract

Little is known about the impact of care provider's specialty on the medical costs of COPD patients over time. To compare the long-term medical costs between newly hospitalized COPD patients whose post-discharge care was initiated by a pulmonary specialist versus by a general practitioner. Retrospective matched cohort study. We identified patients with an incident COPD-related hospitalization from the administrative health database (January 1, 1996, to December 31, 2012) of British Columbia, Canada. Patients were categorized as receiving specialist care or primary care within the first 90 days after discharge from an incident COPD-related hospitalization. Using propensity scores, we matched each patient who initially received specialist care to a patient who received primary care based on demographics, COPD severity, comorbidity, and admission time. A survival-adjusted, multi-part generalized linear model was used to estimate direct medical costs (in 2015 Canadian dollars, [$], including inpatient, outpatient, pharmacy, and community care costs) as overall and as COPD-specific and comorbidity-related costs over the following 5 years. The sample included 7710 patients under each group. The initial specialist-care recipients had a modestly higher 5-year survival than the generalist-care recipients (0.564 [95% CI 0.535, 0.634] vs 0.555 [95% CI 0.525, 0.625]; P < .001). Meanwhile, the former incurred $2809 higher all-cause medical costs over 5 years compared to the latter (95% CI $2343, $2913; P < .001), mainly driven by higher medication costs (difference $1782 [95% CI $1658, $1830]; P < .001) particularly related to COPD medications ($1170 [95% CI $1043, $1225]; P < .001). Specialist care recipients also incurred higher costs of COPD-related hospitalization ($1144 [95% CI $650, $1221]; P < .001). Compared to generalist care, specialist care following COPD hospitalization is slightly more expensive, mainly driven by medication costs especially COPD-specific medications. Future studies should compare differences in health-related quality of life and COPD functional status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 19%
Researcher 7 16%
Librarian 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 19%
Social Sciences 6 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,943,894
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,251
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,691
of 332,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#77
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.