| Title |
Cloning and sequencing of cellulase cDNA from Aspergillus kawachii and its expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Genetics, April 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00311212 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Sakamoto, G. Tamura, K. Ito, T. Ishikawa, K. Iwano, N. Nishiya |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 35% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 12% |
| Engineering | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,316,586
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from Current Genetics
#44
of 1,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,533
of 25,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Genetics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them