| Title |
Evolutionary algorithms in computer-aided molecular design
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, August 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00124503 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David E. Clark, David R. Westhead |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 35% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 14 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2012.
All research outputs
#5,559,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#254
of 955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,824
of 28,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.