| Title |
Development of a new calcium phosphate powder-binder system for the 3D printing of patient specific implants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10856-006-0073-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alaadien Khalyfa, Sebastian Vogt, Jürgen Weisser, Gabriele Grimm, Annett Rechtenbach, Wolfgang Meyer, Matthias Schnabelrauch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 247 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 18% |
| Researcher | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 78 | 31% |
| Materials Science | 38 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 17 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 12% |
| Unknown | 57 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,649,942
of 23,443,716 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#36
of 1,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,192
of 160,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,443,716 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.