| Title |
Osteogenic potential of human periosteum-derived progenitor cells in PLGA scaffold using allogeneic serum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B, October 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1631/jzus.2006.b0817 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yi-xiong Zheng, Jochen Ringe, Zhong Liang, Alexander Loch, Li Chen, Michael Sittinger |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 32% |
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
| Engineering | 4 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B
#188
of 704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,554
of 88,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.