| Title |
Optimizing Use of the Holmium:YAG Laser for Surgical Management of Urinary Lithiasis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Urology Reports, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11934-014-0397-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abhishek P. Patel, Bodo E. Knudsen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 49% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,550,598
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Current Urology Reports
#272
of 594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,613
of 338,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Urology Reports
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.