↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of Fine‐needle Aspiration, Core Biopsy, and Surgical Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Extremity Soft Tissue Masses

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
16 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
A Comparison of Fine‐needle Aspiration, Core Biopsy, and Surgical Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Extremity Soft Tissue Masses
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11999-010-1401-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sina Kasraeian, Daniel C. Allison, Elke R. Ahlmann, Alexander N. Fedenko, Lawrence R. Menendez

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ukraine 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 151 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 16%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 11 7%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 47 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 39%
Engineering 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 50 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2,519
of 7,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,787
of 113,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#21
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.