| Title |
High efficiency intranasal drug delivery using Intravail® alkylsaccharide absorption enhancers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drug Delivery and Translational Research, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13346-012-0069-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward T. Maggio, Dennis J. Pillion |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 22% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,876,571
of 23,467,261 outputs
Outputs from Drug Delivery and Translational Research
#121
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,986
of 165,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Delivery and Translational Research
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,467,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them