↓ Skip to main content

Evidence synthesis through a degradation model applied to myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Lifetime Data Analysis, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 122)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Evidence synthesis through a degradation model applied to myocardial infarction
Published in
Lifetime Data Analysis, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10985-012-9227-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Commenges, Boris P. Hejblum

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 13%
France 1 13%
Unknown 6 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 50%
Professor 1 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 5 63%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,316,586
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Lifetime Data Analysis
#3
of 122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,278
of 170,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lifetime Data Analysis
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them