↓ Skip to main content

Randomized Assessment of Rapid Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
5227 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2341 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomized Assessment of Rapid Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1414905
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mayank Goyal, Andrew M Demchuk, Bijoy K Menon, Muneer Eesa, Jeremy L Rempel, John Thornton, Daniel Roy, Tudor G Jovin, Robert A Willinsky, Biggya L Sapkota, Dar Dowlatshahi, Donald F Frei, Noreen R Kamal, Walter J Montanera, Alexandre Y Poppe, Karla J Ryckborst, Frank L Silver, Ashfaq Shuaib, Donatella Tampieri, David Williams, Oh Young Bang, Blaise W Baxter, Paul A Burns, Hana Choe, Ji-Hoe Heo, Christine A Holmstedt, Brian Jankowitz, Michael Kelly, Guillermo Linares, Jennifer L Mandzia, Jai Shankar, Sung-Il Sohn, Richard H Swartz, Philip A Barber, Shelagh B Coutts, Eric E Smith, William F Morrish, Alain Weill, Suresh Subramaniam, Alim P Mitha, John H Wong, Mark W Lowerison, Tolulope T Sajobi, Michael D Hill

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
Japan 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Korea, Republic of 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Other 16 <1%
Unknown 2285 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 354 15%
Other 281 12%
Student > Bachelor 216 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 199 9%
Student > Postgraduate 198 8%
Other 612 26%
Unknown 481 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1144 49%
Neuroscience 211 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 3%
Engineering 63 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 2%
Other 188 8%
Unknown 615 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 527. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#47,323
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,601
of 32,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#458
of 367,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#12
of 365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.