You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Randomized Assessment of Rapid Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1414905 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mayank Goyal, Andrew M Demchuk, Bijoy K Menon, Muneer Eesa, Jeremy L Rempel, John Thornton, Daniel Roy, Tudor G Jovin, Robert A Willinsky, Biggya L Sapkota, Dar Dowlatshahi, Donald F Frei, Noreen R Kamal, Walter J Montanera, Alexandre Y Poppe, Karla J Ryckborst, Frank L Silver, Ashfaq Shuaib, Donatella Tampieri, David Williams, Oh Young Bang, Blaise W Baxter, Paul A Burns, Hana Choe, Ji-Hoe Heo, Christine A Holmstedt, Brian Jankowitz, Michael Kelly, Guillermo Linares, Jennifer L Mandzia, Jai Shankar, Sung-Il Sohn, Richard H Swartz, Philip A Barber, Shelagh B Coutts, Eric E Smith, William F Morrish, Alain Weill, Suresh Subramaniam, Alim P Mitha, John H Wong, Mark W Lowerison, Tolulope T Sajobi, Michael D Hill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 21% |
| Spain | 7 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 23% |
| Scientists | 14 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | <1% |
| Spain | 6 | <1% |
| Japan | 5 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2303 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 353 | 15% |
| Other | 280 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 214 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 198 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 197 | 8% |
| Other | 628 | 27% |
| Unknown | 489 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1142 | 48% |
| Neuroscience | 213 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 3% |
| Engineering | 63 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 2% |
| Other | 199 | 8% |
| Unknown | 622 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 529. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#48,028
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,617
of 32,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#460
of 369,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#12
of 365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.