↓ Skip to main content

Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke with Perfusion-Imaging Selection

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
4924 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2209 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke with Perfusion-Imaging Selection
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1414792
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce C V Campbell, Peter J Mitchell, Timothy J Kleinig, Helen M Dewey, Leonid Churilov, Nawaf Yassi, Bernard Yan, Richard J Dowling, Mark W Parsons, Thomas J Oxley, Teddy Y Wu, Mark Brooks, Marion A Simpson, Ferdinand Miteff, Christopher R Levi, Martin Krause, Timothy J Harrington, Kenneth C Faulder, Brendan S Steinfort, Miriam Priglinger, Timothy Ang, Rebecca Scroop, P Alan Barber, Ben McGuinness, Tissa Wijeratne, Thanh G Phan, Winston Chong, Ronil V Chandra, Christopher F Bladin, Monica Badve, Henry Rice, Laetitia de Villiers, Henry Ma, Patricia M Desmond, Geoffrey A Donnan, Stephen M Davis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Other 13 <1%
Unknown 2159 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 359 16%
Other 277 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 204 9%
Student > Bachelor 188 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 179 8%
Other 563 25%
Unknown 439 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1077 49%
Neuroscience 204 9%
Engineering 74 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 2%
Other 187 8%
Unknown 556 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 357. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#89,874
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#2,385
of 32,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#962
of 367,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#21
of 365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.