You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke with Perfusion-Imaging Selection
|
---|---|
Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1414792 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bruce C V Campbell, Peter J Mitchell, Timothy J Kleinig, Helen M Dewey, Leonid Churilov, Nawaf Yassi, Bernard Yan, Richard J Dowling, Mark W Parsons, Thomas J Oxley, Teddy Y Wu, Mark Brooks, Marion A Simpson, Ferdinand Miteff, Christopher R Levi, Martin Krause, Timothy J Harrington, Kenneth C Faulder, Brendan S Steinfort, Miriam Priglinger, Timothy Ang, Rebecca Scroop, P Alan Barber, Ben McGuinness, Tissa Wijeratne, Thanh G Phan, Winston Chong, Ronil V Chandra, Christopher F Bladin, Monica Badve, Henry Rice, Laetitia de Villiers, Henry Ma, Patricia M Desmond, Geoffrey A Donnan, Stephen M Davis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 5 | 16% |
Mexico | 4 | 13% |
United States | 3 | 9% |
Argentina | 2 | 6% |
Spain | 2 | 6% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
South Africa | 1 | 3% |
Egypt | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 59% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 28% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | <1% |
Spain | 6 | <1% |
Germany | 4 | <1% |
Japan | 4 | <1% |
Brazil | 3 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Other | 13 | <1% |
Unknown | 2170 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 359 | 16% |
Other | 277 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 199 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 186 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 179 | 8% |
Other | 570 | 26% |
Unknown | 450 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 1072 | 48% |
Neuroscience | 201 | 9% |
Engineering | 74 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 2% |
Other | 194 | 9% |
Unknown | 566 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 357. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#91,360
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#2,414
of 32,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#976
of 373,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#21
of 365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.