↓ Skip to main content

Biomechanics of Overhand Throwing with Implications for Injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
408 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
Title
Biomechanics of Overhand Throwing with Implications for Injuries
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-199621060-00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Glenn S. Fleisig, Steven W. Barrentine, Rafael F. Escamilla, James R. Andrews

Abstract

Proper throwing mechanics may enable an athlete to achieve maximum performance with minimum chance of injury. While quantifiable differences do exist in proper mechanics for various sports, certain similarities are found in all overhand throws. One essential property is the utilisation of a kinetic chain to generate and transfer energy from the larger body parts to the smaller, more injury-prone upper extremity. This kinetic chain in throwing includes the following sequence of motions: stride, pelvis rotation, upper torso rotation, elbow extension, shoulder internal rotation and wrist flexion. As each joint rotates forward, the subsequent joint completes its rotation back into a cocked position, allowing the connecting segments and musculature to be stretched and eccentrically loaded. Most notable is the external rotation of the shoulder, which reaches a maximum value of approximately 180 degrees. This biomechanical measurement is a combination of true glenohumeral rotation, trunk hyperextension and scapulothoracic motion. Near the time of maximum shoulder external rotation (ERmax), shoulder and elbow musculature eccentrically contract to produce shoulder internal rotation torque and elbow varus torque. Both the shoulder and the elbow are susceptible to injury at this position. At ball release, significant energy and momentum have been transferred to the ball and throwing arm. After ball release, a kinetic chain is used to decelerate the rapidly moving arm with the entire body. Shoulder and elbow muscles produce large compressive forces to resist joint distraction. Both joints are susceptible to injury during arm deceleration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 272 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 20%
Student > Bachelor 35 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 10%
Other 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 71 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 74 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 62 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 7%
Engineering 19 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 84 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2017.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#2,547
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,088
of 194,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#824
of 1,011 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,011 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.