↓ Skip to main content

Intubation with VivaSight or conventional left-sided double-lumen tubes: a randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Intubation with VivaSight or conventional left-sided double-lumen tubes: a randomized trial
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12630-015-0329-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rolf Schuepbach, Bastian Grande, Giovanni Camen, Alexander R. Schmidt, Henrik Fischer, Daniel I. Sessler, Burkhardt Seifert, Donat R. Spahn, Kurt Ruetzler

Abstract

Double-lumen endotracheal tubes (DLTs), which are commonly used for single-lung ventilation during surgery, are difficult to insert. In addition, they often move during surgical lung manipulation which can cause life-threatening complications. Flexible bronchoscopy is used routinely to establish and confirm proper DLT placement. The newly designed VivaSight DLT has an integrated camera, allowing continuous visualization of its position in the trachea. We hypothesized that the time to intubation using the VivaSight DLT would be faster than with a conventional DLT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 9 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2015.
All research outputs
#1,218,669
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#114
of 2,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,485
of 360,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#5
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.